Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a leading public interest group focused on technology, responded to a recent post on the Federal Trade Commission's ongoing review of Google Inc.'s acquisition of DoubleClick Inc.:
I just want to make clear our message (Center for Digital Democracy) to the FTC and the Congress is that the Google acquisition of DoubleClick must be rejected on competition [antitrust] grounds. (We also have serious concerns about consumer data privacy as well with the proposed merger.) CDD already petitioned the FTC to investigate the growing consolidation in the online ad marketplace in a filing last November (see our Web site, www.democraticmedia.org ). There has been a steady — and alarming — trend of acquisitions and buyouts in the field over the last two or so years. Certainly the developments in the last several months are stunning — anywhere between $12-15B in deals focused on the control of consumer data, primarily for interactive advertising (Google-DoubleClick; Micrsoft-aQuantive; Yahoo!-Right Media; WPP-24/7 Real Media and the proposed private takeover of Acxiom).
But Google-DoubleClick brings the online ad market beyond a dangerous concentrated tipping point (btw, even the Interactive Advertising Bureau notes in its 2006 online ad revenue review published last May that "Online advertising continues to remain concentrated with the 10 leading ad-selling companies, which accounted for 69% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2006. ...") Google dominates the search ad part of the online ad market. It could have competed in the one part of the market it doesn't control, but covets: display ads. But it's simply taking out what should have been a competitor, primarily so they can use the existing business relationships — and strategic information — with each of DoubleClick's deep-pocketed clients. Such a move will create a monopolistic market for Google in what is a critical part of the electronic communications economy. This is true in the U.S. and abroad (an aspect of the case that has been acknowledged by our EU-based consumer group allies).
The online ad market has evolved rapidly and has reached near-maturation in terms of practices, basic applications and distribution pathways. We need to preserve what little competition is still possible. That's why we have told FTC commissioners, merger review staff, the staffs of the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee and the House Commerce Committee that the merger must be rejected. We have submitted documents, brought in academic experts and plan to further press for an outright rejection. We also have made it clear that the deal threatens consumer privacy in a very substantial way.
Jeff Chester
Executive Director
Center for Digital Democracy
Thanks for the info, Alex. In principle I agree with you--storing search user info is fraught with risk. But I wonder if that particular train has left the station. For better or for worse, there's enormous commercial value in such data, and entire industries are mobilizing around the goal of monetizing it.











del.icio.us
Technorati



Privacy concerns are becoming a major social and legal issue these days and search engines play an important role in the whole equation.
The AOL Privacy Breach last year is just one example of what can happen if search engine user-data are being stored.
The many recent publications like yours about Privacy and Search Engines confirms this is even more relevant...
Meta-search engine Ixquick.com's simple solution: "If the data is not stored, users privacy can't be breached”.
We are the first search engine to stop recording any privacy details of our users.
Some background information:
-Ixquick is a meta search engine, developed in 1998 in NY.
-It offers a simultaneous search in up to 12 of the best search engines.
-Ixquick will not share IP addresses with these individual search engines while searching.
-Ixquick will delete the IP addresses of the users within 48 hrs.
In fact we have a program running which opens the log files, deletes the user related IP
addresses and overwrites the "old" logfile. Also we took away the unique ID out of our
Cookies, the Cookie is only used for remembering the settings on the user's PC. We even
overwrite the "old" Cookie if a user has one on his PC from before this privacy initiative.
Read more on how Ixquick protects Privacy on: http://ixquick.com/eng/protect_privacy.html
Conclusion:
www.ixquick.com offers its users a high quality web search without storing any privacy data...
Our initiative is being met with overwhelmingly positive response.
Please contact us if you would like additional information.
Best regards,
Alex van Eesteren
alex@ixquick.com